
Would you allow residents to hire your staff? Most nursing homes would likely find that idea unimaginable, if not outright crazy. But at Sunny Hill Nursing Home of Will County, in Joliet, Illinois, residents play a critical role in the hiring process. Indeed, no employee is hired without resident approval.
On the homepage of its website, Sunny Hill proudly proclaims it is on the culture change journey. The home, licensed for 238 residents, is among the dwindling number of county-owned skilled nursing facilities in the nation.
As part of its culture change, Sunny Hill decided in 2007 to include a trained committee of residents in the final stage of its hiring process. “Our residents are the boss and remain in control of their lives,” said Becky Haldorson, assistant administrator, at a workshop at the 2014 Pioneer Network conference. “This shows that management has respect for their opinions.”
She acknowledges the process has not been an easy one. She began by speaking with the Director of Nursing and the heads of the social services, dietary, and housekeeping departments. “I said if we’re going to do this, we have to have 110 percent buy-in from all of you,” she said. “And there was.” Sunny Hill employees are also union members, adding an additional layer of complexity to the decision to include residents in the hiring process. (Because applicants are not yet union members, that became a non-issue after much discussion.)
Department heads review the applications and conduct the initial interviews. Once they have made their final choice, the preferred applicant must meet with the resident committee. The committee then votes to accept or reject the applicant. The residents have interviewed more than 300 potential employees since 2007. Of those, the committee gave a thumbs down to 36. On at least two occasions, the DON was enthusiastic about a proposed CNA, “but the residents couldn’t stand her,” and the applicants did not get the job. Others failed background checks or physicals. That leaves 228 employees who have been hired using the resident-approval process.
To serve on the hiring committee, a resident must commit to being available every Monday and Friday at 1:30, in case an interview needs to be scheduled. Haldorson aims for four to six committee members—or a minimum of three– participating in each interview. They all undergo training, to ensure the interviews are conducted professionally—and legally.
“We knew they had to understand the legalities of doing an interview,” she explained. “We are accountable. We had a lot of conversations about what they can and cannot ask. They can’t ask how old you are, your sexual preference, or the number of children you have.” Residents tend to not want to hurt people’s feelings, said Haldorson, and she cautions the committee to not be swayed by an applicant’s sad personal story. The average age of the residents on the committee is 87; one committee member was 104 years old.
Haldorson looks for residents to serve on the committee who had some hiring and firing experience during their careers. Residents are instructed to introduce themselves based on their identities as retired professionals, whatever that may be, rather than as “a resident of 10 years.” Before the interview, Haldorson briefly explains to the committee the applicant’s work history.
Residents helped her develop the questions, and that process alone took nearly three months. Among the questions:
Could you tell us what position you are applying for and what experience you have in this capacity?
What would your past employers say about your work performance?
Describe your work ethic.
What path led you to working with elders in long term care?
If you are not sure what is expected of you, what would you do?
Describe what you know about person-centered care.
If you witnessed something inappropriate what would you do?
If you are not able to keep a promise to me, how would you explain your actions?
If I ask for something special would you get it for me (e.g. a cup of coffee at 10:00 at night)?
What will we talk about while you are caring for me?
What would you like to share with us about yourself that would influence our decision to approve your being hired here at Sunny Hill?
In addition, those working in the nursing department are asked other questions related to resident care.
The residents then go around the table and tell potential employees what they would expect of them if they are hired. After the applicant leaves, Haldorson returns and one by one, residents share their comments, which she writes down.
Haldorson says the process sends a message to all applicants about Sunny Hill’s commitment to culture change. “Potential employees establish a relationship with residents before they even meet their coworkers,” she says. As a result, “the staff respect residents as decision-making adults.”
This article first appeared in the January-April 2015 PADONA Journal of the Pennsylvania Directors of Nursing Association.
Hi! I am an Aging 200 student at the Erikson School of Aging, and quite honestly, this is one of the best things I have read in a while. We’ve recently been learning about the different ways people are attempting to help stave off some of the downsides of aging, and being able to be this involved in the world around them seems like a great way to help. Kudos to them!
I am currently a AGNG 200 student at the Erickson School of Aging. I completely agree with the rationale behind involving residents in the hiring of staff. During a regular interview between hiring manager and a potential employee, you can’t possible understand how they will interact with an aging individual. Giving the residents the chance to interact and make a decision on who will be hired dramatically increases the likely hood that it will be a successful hire. Creating this new way of operating Nursing Homes will increase the positivity and ability for our Aging population to reach it’s full potential.
I love the idea though as someone else mentioned it is not new. What would have been helpful in the article are two things:
1. What kind of impact it is having on the day to day lives of residents, families and team members.
2. What impact it has had on employee turnover.
If these kinds of practices are the right thing to do . . . meaning it improves lives the evidence part has to be there.
Steve Moran
seniorhousingforum.net
not a radical idea really. makes very good sense. in the past, i have been interviewed for a teaching position by a group that i would be working with…the teachers in a preschool…not an easy interview, but a good one…probably wouldn’t be possible to include the preschoolers. it makes perfectly good sense that residence should have a say.
This is one of the questions we ask all our participant Managers when we conduct an Eden Alternative Associate training here in the UK. Most are doing it and have been for some time. You can’t operate a person centred approach to care if this is not one of your operational practices. Not so radical here.
It is good to hear (and implement) the importance of a voice to having input and say to the personal care however, I have witnessed the power plays and strife that residents can also bring to the table wrecking havoc with morale, devaluing those workers who do care and lumping them under one umbrella; it very quickly can turn to ‘us verses them’ mentality. A combined mission statement and rules governing behavior, ethics, respect – all encompassing and ongoing priority.
Beth, At The Eden Alternative we love this idea. We have many Eden Registry members that involve their Elders in the hiring process, particularly homes that have neighborhoods established. These neighborhoods are made up of a tight circle of care partners where everyone has a stake and an interest in who joins the team. Getting the Elders involved just makes sense and they thrive on being part of the process.